A while back, I had a bit of a go at my kid's school and its use of social media. To be fair, it does do something to do with social media at least approximately right. The school's Home School Agreement is worded fairly reasonably:
At least it's better than the Home School Agreements some other schools try to enforce. For example:
* A name I just made up - any resemblance to any actual school of that name, if one exists, is entirely coincidental.
"Respect the school through the individual and joint use of social media including the posting of pictures following a school event.""Respect" is a bit ambiguous and weaselly, but you could interpret this to mean "Use social media responsibly, don't post pictures of other people's kids, or blurt out confidential information better discussed with staff in private, or say anything defamatory - in short, we expect you to behave like a reasonable adult", in which case, fair enough.
At least it's better than the Home School Agreements some other schools try to enforce. For example:
"Parents will ... Not make reference to the school on social networking sites."There are things a school would quite rightly want to control - I've already mentioned a few examples. But a social networking ban on mentioning the school that your child goes to, ever, under any circumstances? Is it just me, or isn't that a bit unreasonable?
Parent: "Little Topsy is loving Year Four at Sunnybrook Community School* and doing really well!"
School: "You're in breach of your Home School Agreement. Don't let this happen again!"
Parent: "So proud of young Timmy for winning the Sunnybrook Community School inter-house athletics cup!"
School: "We warned you..."
* A name I just made up - any resemblance to any actual school of that name, if one exists, is entirely coincidental.
0 comments:
Post a Comment